вторник, 14 октября 2008 г.

ararat mount turkey




So Iapos;ve seen quite a few movies recently and I wanted to keep track of what Iapos;ve been posting about them.�I frequent basically two message boards and lately Iapos;ve been full of chatter. Iapos;m including responses as of today because I want to have the whole convo intact. I am not including names of the other posters because I feel I do not have the right to do so.

First up ... The Dark Knight

This was posted at Vanguard by me in reply to a "Thoughts on TDK" type post ...

I saw it at the midnight showing and it was fantastic. Thankfully the full house had minimal talking and the normally not so great theatre had a great screen and IMO great speakers. I think Heath did a marvelous job, but I canapos;t help but feel his performance is over hyped. Everything about the movie fit perfectly together, from the acting to the script to the cinematography. Definitely one of my favorite films.

I saw it for the second time at the drive in this past Saturday and Iapos;m hoping to see it in IMAX sometime.


Here is the first response to me ...

Iapos;ve seen it three times now and plan to go IMAX for the next round (my son works at a science museum with an IMAX, but the film was sold out for days in advance there). The movie just gets better with repeated viewings, IMO.

I donapos;t think Ledgerapos;s performance was overhyped as much as the others were underhyped. Aaron Eckhart was tremendous as Harvey, Oldman was perfect as Gordon and Bale, Freeman, Gylanhaal - they were just tremendous. There are a few continuity flaws, seemingly made by the editing out of a scene or two, but still, a film truly deserving of the overused term "masterpiece."

My reply ...

I agree about the roles being under hyped, gothamdragonfly. Thatapos;s somewhat why I felt Heathapos;s was over hyped. This was a true ensemble piece. With that said, Bale did a fantastic job with showing how childlike Bruce still is. The Rachel situation really showed that well. His optimism with being with her, the way he talked to Alfred about her waiting for him after her departure, both situations showed an innocent and vulnerable side I think every other Bat film has failed to portray. It was as if it never occurred to him that she had to move forward or, better yet, life in general has to move forward.

Gary Oldman did a brilliant job as Gordon. Every second of his screen time had significance to the movie as a whole and it was great to see his family. Iapos;m interested to see what happens with his son. I find it odd to give him the screen time he was given without having a purpose. Personally, Iapos;d love to see his daughter become Batgirl, or at least start the journey toward it, in a future film. Her name was never revealed, but I find it hard to believe Nolan would use a name other than Barbara.

Maggie was a superb choice for Rachel. She gave her own spin and it worked. I wished they wouldapos;ve cast her in the first film because I canapos;t help but feel like Katieapos;s was a completely different person.

Morgan did a good job as well. His assistance to Batman throughout was one of the many fantastic things about the film

Every time I heard Aaron Eckhart talk in his angry/two-face tone it sounded similar to Baleapos;s Batman voice. Maybe it was just me, but I found that a little annoying. In no way is that intended to criticizes his performance, just something I noticed.

What I found so fantastic about the film was how it wasnapos;t a super hero film, it was a film about people, about society and about life. The super hero bit was the icing on the vegan cake.�

And of course, their reply ...



A good point. Not everyone sees that the decision to devote your life and soul to the protection of a city requires an enormous degree of optimism. You have to believe youapos;re making a difference, even when it seems otherwise. Parts of Bruce, including his emotional entanglements, have been stunted since his parentsapos; death. Quite honestly, I think he saw Rachel - as she pointed out to him - his only chance at a normal life, while Harvey loved her wholeheartedly for who she was as a person. He certainly knew the adult Rachel much better than Bruce did, which is why it was ultimately right that she chose Harvey.

Youapos;ve also pegged it right in regard to the replacement of KH with the eminently more talented Maggie G. I wanted to smack the Batman Begins Rachel for kissing Bruce first, leading him to believe she could accept him as he was, then add, "By the way, you and me? Not gonna happen." Rachel was portrayed much more sympathetically and heroically in TDK. Her death scene was a counterpoint to the Joker asking the cop guarding him if he wanted to know which one of his friends were cowards. She died a hero. Itapos;s just a shame that she had to die believing Bruce had chosen Harveyapos;s life (the symbol of Gotham City) over hers.



I agree completely And yay for vegan cake


My response ...

I completely agree about everything youapos;ve posted. One of the many things Nolan and co. Did well with was having a purpose for every character, if they were in a scene it was for a reason, if they said something it was because it had meaning, etc. Rachelapos;s death was crucial on so many levels, as youapos;ve stated. Definitely not a "Women in Refrigerators" situation.

I too found it tragic that she was so sure sheapos;d be saved instead of Harvey, verbally wishing theyapos;d save him instead, only to discover in her last few seconds that they did save him. Of course Bruce thought he was saving Rachel until it was too late. When Joker told him where Harvey and Rachel were being held I felt they nailed the character. Typical Joker to mess with peopleapos;s heads. Heapos;s crazy, but very intuitive and knew Batman would go for Rachel first. For some reason, I think a lot of people who saw it at the theater I was at the first time (canapos;t say the second because I went to a drive-in) didnapos;t get that. Heath and Bale played off each other well, especially in that scene.

Canapos;t forget the vegan cake, way better than its dairy filled counterpart



eye-servant, ararat mount turkey, ararat mountain, ararat mountain map, ararat mountains.



понедельник, 13 октября 2008 г.

creek+




I have like, 4 muses yeah? okay, but I want to make more.....Is that bad? I dont know. There is one muse that I want to try out buuuuuttttt~ I dont really like him to much, like physically. Heapos;s not very attractive to me, but his personality is sooo cute~ I mean knowing his personality makes him cute in my eyes, like physically, but at first I really didnapos;t like him...at all. I was so confused why people thought he was hot. I still dont find him hot, but he is cute to me.

Making no sense huh? yeah. I know its confusing. After I got to know his personality I find him cute, but dont find him hot at all. I honestly think heapos;s ugly, like I dont get why he has so many fan girls. He has pictures where its like OMG~ but not usually. I dont know. The reason Im not saying his name is cause he has fangirls around every corner....I swear. They would be like "OMG you dont like him?? why not?? how come you find him ugly~? what is wrong with you?" and id be like "fuck off." and yeah. It wouldnapos;t be good. I dont want to die from fan girls Kthxbye.

Hm, I want to make him but dont know about it...I want to make a few more...but I dont know..

I probably will in the end though.

Ugh, I fail.

hearts;


creek+, creek's, creek worton, creek woods village resort.



воскресенье, 12 октября 2008 г.

flaming june spa vancouver




I woke up this morning and had almost two whole minutes where I was okay.�Then reality hit me again. Iapos;m so tired of crying.

The word why wonapos;t get out of my head. Not that it matters, I tell myself. I listened to every excuse in existence for over ten years. I know them all by heart. Even if some of them are true, none of it changes anything. I need to stop obsessing about it, I tell myself. Everyone lies. No one makes sense. Decent people simply do not exist. I did the right thing, I tell myself. I got out immediately this time. I kept some of myself this time. If I can hold on to that, I can survive somehow, enough to stick around for the kids. Iapos;m finally being smart, I tell myself. Iapos;m skipping the hellish repetitious years that kill my soul and screw up my children. Iapos;m skipping the next time, and the next time, and the next time, and finding out about the times before... I repeat the facts to myself like a mantra, trying get a grip. The person you gave your entire being to was just a lie. The person you ache for never actually existed. Stay away. Donapos;t loose the past two years of mental and emotional progress with destructive, masochistic selfish thoughts. She made her choice to ruin everything, and you will never know why. It happens every time. Just learn from it and never put yourself in that place again. Ever. The only real happiness is in your childapos;s smile.

Why. I had this image of us, old and grey, holding hands and watching our grandkids play. Happy. Smiling. Thatapos;s all I wanted. Perfect love. Safety. Am I really so completely lacking as a person? The one person who could possibly fill that role thought so...

NO. I need to stop. Iapos;m sure Iapos;m a lousy person, but I really did try so hard. If it wasnapos;t enough, it was all I could do.

Her dadapos;s getting her a lawyer. Thatapos;s wonderful. Makes it easier to destroy everything AND come out ahead doing it.

I alternate between being angry, confused, hurt, and just breaking down. Why. Everything she said rips a new hole in me. Less than three days ago: "Do you promise to love me forever, no matter what?" Yeah. Yeah, I do. I sure as hell wish I didnapos;t.

WHY.

Maybe she didnapos;t actually want the same things as me. Maybe she changed her mind. Maybe I wasnapos;t anything more than a crutch. She told me once when we first got together that she was only using me to feel better. I didnapos;t care. I had no self-worth, self-esteem, or self-preservation. I clung to her anyway. I guess maybe that never changed when she said it did. I was just convenient, but not desirable.

WHY?

Every thought is like being stabbed. Over and over. Her hair. Her smile. Her touch. I miss it. Stab. Itapos;s gone forever. STAB. It was all a lie. Just fucking kill me, please...

Then I try to stop bawling and breathe. You get to see your Alex today. You get to hold someone who actually does love you for now, truly and unconditionally. Focus on that. But it doesnapos;t help. I think of the six months we went through hell fighting for him. I think of us standing there, holding each other, watching him sleep. WHY? How is this the better choice? Why wouldnapos;t she just leave me? Why couldnapos;t she be honest? My entire life seems to be pain. I canapos;t believe I was actually convinced that was over. I canapos;t believe anything...

I donapos;t know why Iapos;m typing this. I guess I donapos;t know what else to do. Everything I do, whatever I look at is somehow tied to her. That beautiful, heartbreaking person I never actually knew. The smile that could fool me every time. I feel so used, so broken. Why. Why why why why why.

My mind starts coming up with baseless conjecture to further crush me. Somehow I start feeling like the evil monster, the unfair antagonist. I anticipate everyone going against me. Every new family member who supported me, watched me slowly become someone worth knowing... Gone. I wonder if they talk about me like they did Brett. Oh, that jerk was never good enough for you anyway... Youapos;ll find better easily

Breathe. Keep it together. Think logically. If you sell your monitor, desktop, and guitar maybe you can keep the house another month, Our house. I wonder if it was three years ago today I was trying to type journal entries through blurry eyes. Taking twenty minutes to properly get out two lines. I guess that would be ironic, except I always end up back at this place. I start wondering how things will get divided up. I picture each room, and start crying again... The pictures I had just set up in the living room. Alex. Our engagement. For the love of fucking god, WHYYYY



dressage double bridle, flaming june spa vancouver, flaming june spa, flaming june print, flaming june painting.



cheap umd movies




The last time Texas exited the Red River Rivalry unbeaten, the Horns went on to win a national title. That 2005 title team was of course led by Vince Young and VY left for the NFL the next season. A kid named Colt McCoy took his place, and Texas fans wondered how in the world they could ever replace one of the greatest college quarterbacks ever. Move ahead 3 years to Saturday in the Cotton Bowl. Colt McCoy throws and runs the Horns past Oklahoma. 5 beats 1 and suddenly Texas fans are thinking national title again. How classic would it be for the kid who replaced VY to do just what VY had done? Lead Texas to the top of college football.



Tim Melton



dodge superchargers, cheap umd movies, cheap uncontested divorce, cheap under armor, cheap under armour.



decorative free painting project




Hey, Ketsuban here with second character, Phoenix Wright. Iapos;m not sure exactly what point heapos;s from, but itapos;s some time after the third game ends. Maybe a week or so I donno.

Also, I am busy right now but eventually I will put up a permissions post, because he has Mayaapos;s magatama with him. For those of you who donapos;t know the canon, that means if you lie, he can tell. Well, thatapos;s the basic gist of it. Itapos;s more complicated than that but I donapos;t feel like writing anything up right now 8D;

Anyway, yeah, this should be fun
decorative free painting project, decorative free painting pattern tole, decorative free painting pattern, decorative free painting.



dressage chat room




ACORN : Voter Fraud or Voter Disenfranchisement?

��� Theyrsquo;re at it again, folks. It seems that the only way Republicans feel they can win an election is to prevent votes from being counted-or even better-by preventing voters from voting in the first place. Calling into question every single new voter registration while simultaneously shutting down the Social Security database (for ldquo;routine maintenancerdquo;) that allows states to verify voter identity would certainly do that.

��� But, as Rep. John Conyers, (D-Mich.) and Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and the senior African-American member of Congress, said, ldquo;Itrsquo;s pretty clear. Yoursquo;ve got a black candidate for president for the first time. Do you think that the usual attempts to suppress voting among minorities are going to go down and not up? Of course not.rdquo; ( MSNBC, ldquo;Parties Wage War over Voter Fraud, Intimidationrdquo;, Friday Oct. 10) But Obamarsquo;s race may have nothing to do with it. Concentrating on the mechanics, on the switches and levers of the voting system, instead of the issues, is a tried and true Republican tactic. And it looks like theyrsquo;re trying it again.

���� ldquo;Conventional wisdomrdquo; among pollsters is that a large voter turnout will favor Obama, while a small voter turnout will benefit McCain. So itrsquo;s to the Republicansrsquo; advantage to keep the pool of potential voters as small as possible by any means necessary. Charges of alleged voter fraud will hamper voter registration, and thus limit the pool of possible voters. Systematic disenfranchisement of voters based on a smear campaign of unproven ldquo;voter fraudrdquo; will definitely clog the system and render any outcome of the election doubtful. Or in other words, if McCain canrsquo;t win it, hersquo;ll steal it.

��� These Republican ldquo;switches and leversrdquo; tactics of clogging the voting system played out in the two previous Presidential elections, most notably in Florida in 2000. ldquo;Hanging chadrdquo; and uncounted votes were not the only problems facing voters in Florida. The RNC targeted poor, mostly black voters in Florida; these voters were either ldquo;expungedrdquo; from voter rolls, discouraged from voting at the polling place with stunts reminiscent of the ldquo;poll taxrdquo; days of the old South, or lied to about the location of their polling place. All of which made for amusing television for the British documentary crew that turned up to film it, but hardly showed off American democracy at its best. Yet the tactic worked. The election did not hinge merely on counting votes; it hinged on preventing voters from voting in the first place. And the Republicans are very, very good at this.

��� Remember, the recently Republican controlled Congress were the very people who didnrsquo;t want to renew the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Just didnrsquo;t think it was important enough. Claimed it ldquo;was no longer relevant.rdquo; By a curious coincidence, that very same 1965 Voting Rights Act made the above tactics illegal, and voting a civil right, not a privilege to be withdrawn at the whim of a government official who doesnrsquo;t like either your race or your party. The 1965 Voting Rights Act is ldquo;no longer relevantrdquo; to the Republican party because they donrsquo;t want Americans to vote. They donrsquo;t want you to register to vote because the Republican Party knows that Americans will vote them out of office. And thatrsquo;s the Republican campaign: Jim Crow in a new sheet.

�� It would be a mistake to underestimate the effectiveness of this kind of campaign. McCain isnrsquo;t; his own polling data tell him hersquo;s running behind, so hersquo;s already laying the groundwork to legally challenge the election results. Co-chairman of the McCain advisory team in charge of monitoring alleged voter fraud, former Missouri Sen. John Danforth, hinted atpost-election lawsuits if Obama wins in November. ldquo;The contest could go on for a very long timerdquo;. Danforth also said it would be ldquo;a nightmare in Americardquo; and ldquo;a total horror storyrdquo; if Obama either wins or loses by a small margin ldquo;and the losing side believes it has been cheated.rdquo; (MSNBC, ldquo;Parties Wage War over Voter Fraud, Intimidationrdquo;, Friday Oct. 10) Mind you, that ldquo;nightmarerdquo; is apparently described as ldquo;justicerdquo; when the Republicans are the victors, as in the contested election that first elevated Bush to the Oval Office. American politics is and always has been a game won not by issues but only by hitting the right switches and levers. And if you canrsquo;t winhellip;cheat.

��� Unfortunately, itrsquo;s the American voters who get cheated. Theyrsquo;re cheated out of their faith in the systemhellip;and that faith is the only thing that makes democracy work. Until the election of 2000, when the RNC took the tactics used to disenfranchise minorities in small towns and used them to win a national election, there was a period in the history of the United States where registering to vote was a right. You did it as a ceremonial right of passage into full citizenship; it was your ticket to the glory of participatory democracy. It meant you were an American. And that was that. You stayed registered until you moved, or died. Voting was the definitive right of being an American. Not any more. Now voters fear wholesale ldquo;voter purgesrdquo; of the electoral rolls by local officials who put party affiliation ahead of protecting the right to vote. Senior citizens worry about being turned away from their polling place of forty years because they canrsquo;t produce the correct ldquo;voter IDrdquo;.Voters in the twenty-first century face harassment from registration to polling placehellip;and above all of it hangs the over-arching fear that their vote wonrsquo;t be counted. McCain and the RNC have gnawed away at the very root of American democracy; they want to remove the American citizenrsquo;s unquestioned and hallowed right to vote, and to have that vote count. Now thatrsquo;s ldquo;un-American,rdquo; folks.



dressage chat room, dressage chat, dressage canter, dressage canada.