ACORN : Voter Fraud or Voter Disenfranchisement?
��� Theyrsquo;re at it again, folks. It seems that the only way Republicans feel they can win an election is to prevent votes from being counted-or even better-by preventing voters from voting in the first place. Calling into question every single new voter registration while simultaneously shutting down the Social Security database (for ldquo;routine maintenancerdquo;) that allows states to verify voter identity would certainly do that.
��� But, as Rep. John Conyers, (D-Mich.) and Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and the senior African-American member of Congress, said, ldquo;Itrsquo;s pretty clear. Yoursquo;ve got a black candidate for president for the first time. Do you think that the usual attempts to suppress voting among minorities are going to go down and not up? Of course not.rdquo; ( MSNBC, ldquo;Parties Wage War over Voter Fraud, Intimidationrdquo;, Friday Oct. 10) But Obamarsquo;s race may have nothing to do with it. Concentrating on the mechanics, on the switches and levers of the voting system, instead of the issues, is a tried and true Republican tactic. And it looks like theyrsquo;re trying it again.
���� ldquo;Conventional wisdomrdquo; among pollsters is that a large voter turnout will favor Obama, while a small voter turnout will benefit McCain. So itrsquo;s to the Republicansrsquo; advantage to keep the pool of potential voters as small as possible by any means necessary. Charges of alleged voter fraud will hamper voter registration, and thus limit the pool of possible voters. Systematic disenfranchisement of voters based on a smear campaign of unproven ldquo;voter fraudrdquo; will definitely clog the system and render any outcome of the election doubtful. Or in other words, if McCain canrsquo;t win it, hersquo;ll steal it.
��� These Republican ldquo;switches and leversrdquo; tactics of clogging the voting system played out in the two previous Presidential elections, most notably in
��� Remember, the recently Republican controlled Congress were the very people who didnrsquo;t want to renew the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Just didnrsquo;t think it was important enough. Claimed it ldquo;was no longer relevant.rdquo; By a curious coincidence, that very same 1965 Voting Rights Act made the above tactics illegal, and voting a civil right, not a privilege to be withdrawn at the whim of a government official who doesnrsquo;t like either your race or your party. The 1965 Voting Rights Act is ldquo;no longer relevantrdquo; to the Republican party because they donrsquo;t want Americans to vote. They donrsquo;t want you to register to vote because the Republican Party knows that Americans will vote them out of office. And thatrsquo;s the Republican campaign: Jim Crow in a new sheet.
�� It would be a mistake to underestimate the effectiveness of this kind of campaign. McCain isnrsquo;t; his own polling data tell him hersquo;s running behind, so hersquo;s already laying the groundwork to legally challenge the election results. Co-chairman of the McCain advisory team in charge of monitoring alleged voter fraud, former Missouri Sen. John Danforth, hinted at� post-election lawsuits if Obama wins in November. ldquo;The contest could go on for a very long timerdquo;. Danforth also said it would be ldquo;a nightmare in
��� Unfortunately, itrsquo;s the American voters who get cheated. Theyrsquo;re cheated out of their faith in the systemhellip;and that faith is the only thing that makes democracy work. Until the election of 2000, when the RNC took the tactics used to disenfranchise minorities in small towns and used them to win a national election, there was a period in the history of the
dressage chat room, dressage chat, dressage canter, dressage canada.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий